volkswagen

You are currently browsing articles tagged volkswagen.


Image for article titled Why Buy A VW Golf GTI When You Can Now Pay The Same For The Golf R At Dealerships?

Image: Volkswagen

The Volkswagen Golf GTI is all-new for 2022. So new, in fact, that many dealers still don’t have them in stock. For the dealers that do have these hot hatches in stock, they’ve put them out with hot new markups. Once again, dealers have gone and made the once relatively affordable vehicle unaffordable, putting this hatch at a price level comparable to its spicy brother, the Golf R.

Advertisement

Image for article titled Why Buy A VW Golf GTI When You Can Now Pay The Same For The Golf R At Dealerships?

Screenshot: Volkswagen

The 2022 GTI comes with three rim levels with pricing ranging from $29,545 to $37,995, that’s according to VW. As for dealers’ plans, of the nearly 400 new 2022 GTI’s I found for sale across the country, over 130 have pricing over $43,000. That’s at least $5,000 to over $13,000 over standard pricing.

Image for article titled Why Buy A VW Golf GTI When You Can Now Pay The Same For The Golf R At Dealerships?

Screenshot: AutoFair Volkswagen

AutoFair VW of Nashua in Merrimack, NH has a ‘22 GTI in stock for $43,899. What’s wild is that this is the price after a $3,000 price drop.

Image for article titled Why Buy A VW Golf GTI When You Can Now Pay The Same For The Golf R At Dealerships?

Screenshot: Vista Volkswagen

Or how about Vista VW in Pompeo Beach, FL who’s asking nearly $47,000 for their GTI (remember the SE starts at $34,295).

Advertisement

Image for article titled Why Buy A VW Golf GTI When You Can Now Pay The Same For The Golf R At Dealerships?

Screenshot: Northhampton Volkswagen

Then there’s Northhampton VW in Northhampton, MA. They have what looks to be the highest-priced GTI in the country right now. There is a blue ‘22 GTI SE in stock that they claim has an MSRP of $47,339 with a suspiciously absent window sticker link. Except that MSRP is impossible to achieve on a GTI SE. With every option box ticked, even accessories, a GTI won’t crack $42,000. But the dealer is asking $47,787 for it, a price ironically called the “Love It Price.”

Advertisement

If we look at pricing for the more powerful sibling, the 2022 Golf R, it starts at $43,645 and can top out at $45,440 if you opt for the seven-speed DSG transmission. So, you can pay the same money for a less powerful car?

Unfortunately, if you’re shopping for a GTI, it looks as if a $3,000 to $5,000 markup on top of MSRP isn’t really uncommon, and might remain common for a while. Buyers looking to purchase a GTI may have no choice but to pay these prices, and I’m sure once the Golf R starts hitting dealers, they’ll go for Audi money.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep or RAM check out LA CDJR TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Buying a Volkswagen Touareg V10 TDI clearly hasn’t taught me a lesson in staying away from infamously unreliable Volkswagens because I went and bought another. This 2004 Volkswagen Phaeton is ridiculous in every conceivable manner and it broke on me before I even got it home.

Advertisement

Last week, I said goodbye to my silly Jetta TDI wagon. It was the first car that I’ve ever owned that was modified to great lengths. While I enjoyed the Jetta, I don’t feel that it was really right for me. And that’s OK, because I sold the Jetta to another VW enthusiast who already has great plans for it.

Its replacement is one of the most preposterous cars I’ve ever driven and I paid only $2,500 for it.

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

This Volkswagen Phaeton is a rescue. It was purchased by its previous owner with a bad electronic locking system (KESSY), a broken sunroof, a bad ABS module and more. They replaced all of those parts and brought the car back to life, but weren’t able to finish the job due to being in the military. The car sat for a very long time without being driven or started; its license plates indicating an expiration date in 2019 and odometer coming in at 160,000 miles.

But the previous owner, along with his family, love VWs. They told me stories of having another Phaeton, some buses, and other awesome vehicles in their fleet. Unfortunately, the other Phaeton was too far gone to save.

This Volkswagen Phaeton may look like a Passat with a little extra length, but there’s so much more going on under the metal.

Advertisement

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

It’s the brainchild of former VW Group Chief Ferdinand Piëch and Volkswagen’s engineers were given absurd targets to meet. We’ve covered the mind-boggling engineering of the Phaeton and I highly recommend giving it a read. This is a car with so many computers that it has a second battery just to run them. Here’s my favorite part:

Piech had 10 specifications that the car had to meet, which caused a number of engineers on the team to quit. They included the ability to drive all day long at 186 mph in 120 degree F weather while maintaining a cabin temperature of 71.6 degrees F. Further, the Phaeton had to be able to hit 190 mph without a single vibration. Top Gear actually drove one to 201 mph.

Advertisement

Where the Touareg V10 TDI is a regular Touareg with an addictive engine, Volkswagen spent a lot of time on the Phaeton fine-crafting details that the average driver isn’t going to care about, if they even notice. Look no further than the Phaeton’s brochure flexing about its Italian-made trunk hinges:

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Image: Volkswagen

Advertisement

This Phaeton — a V8 — had a base price commanding $64,600 while the W12 set you back at least $79,900. Fully optioned out, a Phaeton easily surpassed $100,000. Unfortunately for Volkswagen, few buyers were drawn in by its ultra-luxury sedan. In its best year, 2004, Volkswagen moved only 1,939 Phaetons in the States.

That 4.2-liter V8 makes 335-HP that moves the car’s bulky 5,200 pounds of weight with the speed of an Audi TT through 4Motion all-wheel-drive. And the occupants get to enjoy it while the cabin is as quiet as a library.

Advertisement

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

It’s so smooth and so quiet that you have to check the tachometer just to make sure it’s still running. The car’s leather is soft, supple and you can sit in them all day without aches or pains. And check out this wood that wraps around the cabin:

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

It’s genuinely a lovely place to be and if it weren’t for the outdated infotainment system it would be competitive with the luxury cars of today.

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

And the Phaeton’s suspension? It handles bumps so well that you feel like you’re riding on a cloud, despite Illinois’ roads jarring potholes. Boeing 747s have more turbulence than a Phaeton.

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

I was only about an hour into owning this luxo-barge when I encountered one of the downsides of buying a car that’s been sitting for a while.

The temperature gauge stayed right at 200 degrees for the duration of my test drive, and even the 10 miles of country roads that it took to get back to the highway. But as soon as I got up to 70 mph the needle began creeping towards the red.

Advertisement

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

It took roughly 50 miles for it to go from an indicated 200 degrees to sitting on the red line. So I decided to limp it home 50 miles at a time.

Advertisement

This turned what should have been a three-hour drive home into an all-day adventure. At least my cheap 185,000-mile Touareg worked great as a support vehicle.

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

Advertisement

At one point I passed by a Phaeton (wait, what? —ed) that was broken down on the side of the highway only a mile before I had to pull mine over to cool down again. Two Phaetons broken down within a mile of each other, what are the odds?

Eventually, I nursed the car home without even triggering the coolant overheating light. The engine appears to have survived the ordeal, but I’ll have my independent mechanic take a look to make sure I didn’t just warp the engine’s head.

Advertisement

Image for article titled I Bought A Volkswagen Phaeton For $2,500 And It Already Tried To Leave Me Stranded

Photo: Mercedes Streeter

The first thing I’ll do to this car is change its timing belt, thermostat and water pump. This sounds like overkill, but simply getting to the thermostat on this engine involves going through the timing belt, which is also right next to the water pump. I don’t have history on any of these parts, so I might as well do them, too.

Advertisement

That should solve the overheating. It has a few other electrical gremlins that need to be vanquished, like getting its new ABS module coded and figuring out why the air suspension buttons don’t work.

This car is another automotive hero that turned out to be awesome, even if it tried to leave me stranded. Should you buy one? Maybe, but only if you’re some kind of masochist.

For GREAT deals on a new or used INFINITI check out INFINITI of South Bay TODAY!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Illustration for article titled I'm Not Sure If I Think Volkswagen Is Really Changing Its Name To Voltswagen, But Let's Talk About The Original
Screenshot: CALTECH 1968

As I suspect you’ve heard, Volkswagen of America is claiming that they’ll be changing their name to Voltswagen of America, as a way to highlight their new focus on electric vehicles. You may also have heard that we at Jalopnik are pretty skeptical this is really happening, to the point that our bossman Rory said he’ll get a VW tattoo if they do it. It’s April Fool’s day the day after tomorrow, people. More significantly, though, is that “Voltswagen” for an electron-powered VW is by no means a new name. In fact, it goes back to at least 1968.

Advertisement

undefined
Photo: Engineering and Science October 1968 (Other)

Sure, VW is playing it up, with the Voltswagen name used on their website showcasing the ID.4, and they did tweet this:

Okay, okay, we get it. Maybe VW will use the Voltswagen name in specific EV branding, but I’m not sold they’re changing the name of the whole company in the U.S. to “Voltswagen of America.”

We’ll see how it plays out on April first. Until then, I’d like to talk about where I think the Voltswagen name first came from, and I’m happy to say it’s a pretty fun story.

It’s from the Great Electric Car Race of 1968.

That first Voltswagen (well, until we find out about an earlier one) was a 1958 VW Type 2 bus, owned by Caltech student Wally Rippel, who converted it to electric power around 1966 or so, and drove it around town to, as Caltech’s magazine Engineering and Science reported back in 1968,

“…to demonstrate an alternative to smog.”

Rippel then became part of an electric car team at Caltech that challenged an MIT team to a cross-country electric car race: the Caltech team would drive from Pasadena, California to Cambridge, Massachusetts, and the MIT team, in a 1968 Chevy Corvair donated by GM and converted to electric power at MIT, would travel in the opposite direction.

Advertisement

As you might have guessed, attempting this sort of cross-country EV race back in 1968 was borderline bonkers. It wouldn’t even be easy to do today; back then, it was almost Sisyphean.

Advertisement

To accomplish the feat, 54 charging stations were established along the 3,311 mile route, placed between 21 and 95 miles apart. Some of these charging stations were extremely improvised, like this one in Winslow, Arizona that looks to be tapping right off a small roadside power transformer:

undefined
Photo: Engineering and Science October 1968 (Other)

Advertisement

The race was, by all accounts, something of a shitshow: long charge times for both cars (45 minutes to an hour), the MIT Corvair caught on fire, one of the Caltech drivers got the mumps, both teams ended up burning out critical components (motors, transformers, etc), and both teams made significant use of ice to cool the batteries.

undefined
Photo: Popular Science Jan 1969

Advertisement

The Caltech team only used 50 pounds of ice, and only when recharging their lead-cobalt (a variant of lead-acid) batteries. The MIT team’s more advanced nickel-cadmium batteries constantly struggled with overheating, and had to be packed full of ice pretty much all the time, with the team using 350 pounds of ice during the trip.

The race was a great underdog vs. rich kid sort of story, like most movies made in the 1980s. Where Caltech’s Voltswagen was just a student’s personal project car, built using pretty basic and mainstream electrical tech, MIT’s donated brand-new Corvair was cutting-edge in every respect at the time, and as a result was faster (it could do about 60 MPH instead of 55) and was supposed to have a longer range, and recharge faster, as well. It even had a special aerodynamically optimized front facia. It did look pretty cool.

Advertisement

The advanced NiCad batteries used by the MIT team were worth $20,000 in 1968 dollars—that’s about $151,000 today! MIT was not playing around, here.

In practice, though, the technical advantages really didn’t come to matter at all. The MIT car was plagued by technical snags and, while it technically finished the race before the Caltech bus, penalties assessed for all the time it had to be towed en route (the Corvair had to be towed 250 of the race’s first 500 miles at a penalty of 5 min per mile!) eventually gave the win to Caltech, with a time of 210 hours—30 minutes less than MIT.

Advertisement

undefined
Photo: Popular Science Jan 1969

They won by just 30 minutes! That’s amazing!

The Voltswagen wasn’t all that primitive, though—it did have the ability to do some regenerative braking, using the motor driven by the wheels to generate electricity to recharge the batteries, which was used on a long downhill grade into Needles, California.

Advertisement

undefined
Photo: Engineering and Science October 1968 (Other)

Caltech’s Voltswagen proved a few crucial things: sometimes proven reliability beats bleeding-edge tech, and if you’re doing a cross-country drive, it’s great to have a vehicle you can easily sleep in.

Advertisement

You really should read through the whole Caltech article; it’s a fascinating look at how far we’ve come and a great insight into how clever and bold these early EV pioneers were.

undefined
Photo: Engineering and Science October 1968 (Other)

Advertisement

Wally Rippel, the owner of the Voltswagen, later went on to work for JPL and then later Tesla, helping to develop the motor for the original Tesla Roadster around 2006.

Maybe Volkswagen will really become Voltswagen. Maybe not. Either way, it’s worth taking a moment to commemorate that original 1958 Voltswagen, the winner of the first ever Great Transcontinental Electric Car race.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Pick of the Day is something you do not see too often, or perhaps ever, or perhaps become aware of unless you’re some kind of Volkswagen fanatic.

This little yellow sports coupe is a 1975 Puma GT 1600, a cars and truck made in Brazil for the residence market and also seldom seen in the United States; in duration, they were brought right here only in package type, and also few at that.

With a twin-carb, air-cooled 1,600 cc VW boxer engine in the back, the fastback sports car has certain Volkswagen supports, however it really did not start this way. Puma was a small Brazilian car manufacturer that produced automobiles from 1964

with 1995, and the GT initially was constructed as a race auto with front engine/front-wheel-drive powered by a DKW drivetrain. Yet in 1967, Volkswagen purchased DKW and also moved manufacturing out of Brazil, which had stringent taxes regulations versus vehicle imports, thus leaving Puma without any engines available. The sports auto was born-again in 1967 as the GT 1600 with a back engine/rear-wheel-drive layout ala the VW Beetle, and currently for road use.

puma

puma

” It’s reported that just 22,000 were developed,” states the Pompano Beach, Florida, dealership advertising and marketing the Puma on ClassicCars.com. This Volkswagen-powered Puma uses its all-original fiberglass body, which the dealership says has”some small paint imperfections “on the roofing system, and also a black inside that the dealership states appears like brand-new. There’s no details in the advertisement

pertaining to mileage or any kind of repair history. The engine is related to a Volkswagen 4-speed manual transaxle as well as trips on a collection of 14-inch 5-spoke wheels. The undercarriage is strong, the dealer includes, and the auto” runs and drives great. “” Lots of looks as well as enjoyable to drive!!! “the supplier exclaims. This sporty coupe would certainly be a substantial hit at any type of Volkswagen celebration, of which there are lots of, but the proprietor would certainly require to be all set to answer tons of concerns about what it is and where it came from.

puma

The advertisement does not specify whether this Puma was built in Brazil or put together from the kit, which most-likely would have been done by a convenient owner in the United States. The kit-based cars came rather full, with a contractor needing to provide only a VW engine and transaxle, front suspension, wheels and tires.

The Puma is valued at $23.500.

To view this vehicle on ClassicCars.com, see Pick of the Day.

For GREAT deals on a new or used Nissan check out Champion Maserati TODAY!

Tags: , , ,


Illustration for article titled This New Compact SUV From Volkswagen Doesnt Sound Like The Worst Thing In The World
Photo: VW

Volkswagen said today it would be unveiling a new compact SUV next month, in the market segment smaller than Tiguan, which includes cars like the Honda HR-V, Toyota C-HR, Kia Seltos, Hyundai Kona, and probably Subaru Crosstrek. Sure!

Advertisement

October 13 is the day we will see it in full; the teaser up top is all we have for now. This might be the Volkswagen Tarek that VW said last year was coming to the US but I would be happy to be surprised by something different. That car is also known as the Tharu and looks like this:

Illustration for article titled This New Compact SUV From Volkswagen Doesnt Sound Like The Worst Thing In The World
Photo: Volkswagen

Advertisement

This could also be a variation on the T-Roc, which VW doesn’t sell here but a car that VW does sell overseas. That would be a boring version of this reveal, since we already know what the T-Roc looks like:

Illustration for article titled This New Compact SUV From Volkswagen Doesnt Sound Like The Worst Thing In The World
Photo: Volkswagen

Another third, also boring reveal would be unveiling this thing and just calling it Tiguan Cross Sport, a smaller version of Tiguan, which VW hints might be the situation in today’s release:

This new offering will slot under the Tiguan, and is the second proof point of Volkswagen’s doubling-up SUV strategy following the launch of Atlas Cross Sport earlier this year.

Advertisement

A fourth possibility is that it is something else entirely. I would guess that this new compact SUV will be gas-powered if only because VW would be making a much bigger deal of things otherwise but I’d be happy to be surprised in that department as well.

The strategy here doesn’t seem all that complicated and boils down to US consumers preferring crossovers and SUVs over Golfs—VW sold about triple the number of Tiguans (109,572) than Golfs (37,393) here last year. And if this means we have another compact SUV in the market that gets good-enough gas mileage that’s fine. That segment is crowded enough as it is, meaning that VW at least has some incentive to make theirs interesting.

Tags: ,

Known for blending outrageously powerful motors with understated exteriors, RUF Automobile GmbH has made quite a name for itself. But beyond the tire-smoking Yellowbirds, there are a few vehicles which, while possibly not headline material in themselves, help constitute an interesting, varied stable from a company capable of producing more than just performance.

eRUF

A simplified front bumper suits the clean, futuristic ethos behind this car.

Why not embrace the changing times by fitting an electric motor in one of the most classic shapes in the automotive world? The eRUF’s subdued exterior hides a UQM Propulsion system that generates 201 horsepower and 479 lb-ft of torque—all available from zip. That small powerplant makes room for the Axeon iron-phosphate, lithium-ion batteries weighing 12.34 pounds and delivering 160 Ah each.

the 1,212 pounds of powertrain contribute to a total weight of over 4,000 pounds.

Production was slated for fall of 2009, but unfortunately, this never happened.

RT-35 Roadster

The gaping maw of the RT-series cars screams performance.

A drop-top Carrera, still relatively diminutive with the 997’s proportions, using 630 horsepower to move its 3,600-pounds around is an appealing recipe. The RT-35 Roadster is based upon a non-turbo Carrera Cabriolet, but fitted with the defining bodywork that straddles the fence between aggressiveness and respectability. Like the exterior, the 3.8 turbomotor is exaggerated in typical RUF style; staying just this side of ostentatious while still getting a message across. As we can tell from the hurricane powering this car in the footage below, this is no standard 911.

[embedded content]

RUF 3400S

You wouldn’t be out of place by saying the first Boxster needed a little added chutzpah to turn heads. In the case of the 3400S, RUF added that vim and that red-blooded character that the 986 could’ve used. True, the Boxster was a capable car in factory trim, but its soft shape and underpowered engine left a little to be desired.

Viper Green paint and a GT3 front bumper help garner more attention.

With this model, the focus was on swapping in a 3.4-liter engine for a respectable amount of power. Thanks to 310 horsepower and different aero, the 3400S’ 0-60 mph sprint takes just 5.0 seconds, the 100-mph mark is reached in 11.5 seconds, and the top speed is 175 mph.

The 3400S was far more than a straightline special, though. To give it a properly athletic appearance, it received a few bits from the 996.1 GT3. Some portions of the aero kit, those incredible bucket seats, larger brakes, a sports exhaust, upgraded suspension, and additional chassis bracing made the rare 3400S a genuine sports car.

Those stylish, supportive seats make any backroad blitz bliss.

Wider, five-spoke 19″ wheels wrapped in 235/35ZR19 tires up front and 275/30ZR19s in the rear give the 3400S the stance and roadholding a true sports car should have. Though this is a clear demonstration of what RUF do best, there’s no denying that injecting that level of performance into the maligned Boxster, giving it a unique character, and creating a well-balanced, accessible product required a level of ingenuity that goes beyond what many shops can manage.

RUF VW T4

Though it might look better suited to shuttling the kids to soccer, there’s real track potential with this van.

Though the VW T4/Eurovan had an adequate amount of power from the factory, it, like its older brother, could’ve always used a little more. RUF addressed this by implanting a 3.6-liter making 550 horsepower, stiffening the chassis, and replacing the bench seats with Recaro buckets. An unsuspecting van which can hit 60 in 5 seconds ought to get your blood pumping.

The badges on the back hint at the 993 Turbo’s motor quietly nestled between this van’s rear wheels.

RUF Dakara

True, RUF’s bodywork is typically on the conservative side of things. If you’re seeking something that screams at the pedestrian, a Gemballa is arguably the buy for you. However, RUF’s stab at the first-generation Cayenne seems to have borrowed a bit from Gemballa’s book. With the help of Platune Technology, RUF produced the Dakara: a loud, aggressive, wildly-styled SUV with sporting pretensions.

The Dakara’s 600 horsepower and 659 lb-ft make up for the heftier bodywork.

Gills, flares, and the 997 Carrera’s headlights make you double-take. In fact, the most restrained piece of styling are RUF’s signature five-spokes, which complement this cruiser’s shape beautifully in a 22″ size. If there’s a model to try your hand at bling, perhaps the largest and least athletic member of the family is the right one—they won’t mind the added weight.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Graphic: Jason Torchinsky

I’ll admit, when it comes to cars, I often find myself drawn to the outlier designs, the weirder engineering, the trends that didn’t catch on just because, well, that’s what’s interesting to me. Sometimes, though, an example of one of these engineering roads-not-taken surprises me in how, well, rational it seems, even when compared to the current orthodoxy in automotive design. I think the biggest example of this can be seen in an obsolete Volkswagen of Brazil design from the 1970s, especially when compared with the modern transverse/FWD designs that dominate automotive design today.

Advertisement

I know I’ve referenced these ideas before, especially when I talk about my fetish for efficient packaging in automotive design. There’s just something about really maximizing the usable volume of a given space that just, you know, gets me going.

Volkswagen was very good at this; their development of the Type 3 in the early ‘60s, which compressed their flat-four engine into a compact suitcase and crammed it under the floor at the rear created a line of cars with two luggage compartments, front and rear, packaging that was likely best realized in the Squareback wagon version.

Advertisement

This concept was further refined with the Type 4, which used an all-new engine and a full unibody construction, but ended up a relative flop, sales-wise, and was pretty much the end of the road for “mainstream” Volkswagen’s attempts to build mass-market cars with underfloor rear-engines.

Volkswagen did have some bold plans to continue this fundamental engineering principle into a whole new era with their partially Porsche-designed prototype run of cars known as the EA266, which were, essentially, modernized versions of this underfloor-engine design using all-new water-cooled, inline-four engines, laid flat under the rear seat.

Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Illustration: Car Design Archives/VW

In Brazil, though, Volkswagen didn’t give up this idea quite so easily. The Brasilia became the only truly successful Beetle replacement that used the original Beetle’s basic engineering, and it was a rear-underfloor engine design, even if it used the fairly tall Type I engine that limited rear cargo room.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Illustration: VW do Brasil

That’s not the example I want to focus on, though, even if it looks almost identical from the outside. The version of this concept that I want to focus on is the last one Volkswagen ever developed, a version of this design that was built all the way up to 1980, well after Volkswagen’s switch to transverse water-cooled front-engine/front-wheel drive designs from Auto-Union/Audi were well underway.

Advertisement

That car is the Volkswagen Variant II.

Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Illustration: VW do Brasil

Advertisement

The Variant II was a development of the Type 3s that were being built in Brazil, but significantly modernized, inside and out. The exterior design—while not exactly a full unibody like the Type 4 (it was a semi-unibody still, being still based on a modified Type 3 pan) had updated styling that felt very 1980s, all clean and rectilinear, a far cry from the curvy, cushiony first Type 3s from the 1960s.

The Variant II still used the Type 3 suitcase engine with twin carbs —Type 3s had also used electronic fuel injection, the first production cars to do so—but in Brazil I think twin carbs were preferable as they facilitated versions that could run on the local sugar cane alcohol fuel. These cars were also a bit like a Type 3 and 4 hybrid in that they used the MacPherson front suspension from the Type 4, which gave a lot more front luggage room.

Advertisement

Here’s a nice detailed walk-around of a Variant II:

Look how useful that thing is! So many people will take a sedan over a hatchback, despite the hatchback’s inherently greater flexibility and adaptability because they want the security of a metal, sealed cargo area that hides belongings from unsavory belonging-peepers. Well, the Variant II has both! A hatch with a folding rear seat that can be used to haul all kinds of bulky, weird-shaped crap, from lawnmowers to bicycles to strange sports gear, and it still has a good-sized trunk up front for your velveteen bags of Fabérge eggs or whatever it is people so into trunks haul around.

Advertisement

Just from a living with it/daily use/adaptability standpoint, the Variant II’s design seems like an absolute winner when compared to the ubiquitous transverse FWD designs that came to dominate so much of the automotive market for decades.

But it wasn’t really a winner! It didn’t sell all that well, and the next year VW replaced it with the car we knew as the two-door wagon version of the VW Fox, known in Brazil as the Parati.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Photo: VW do Brasil

The Parati was far more modern car, with roots in the water-cooled, transverse cars VW was developing and having so much success with like the Golf and Passat.

Advertisement

The Parati/first-gen Fox was a bit unusual in that it was a longitudinal FWD car, later becoming a transverse design with subsequent updates.

Now, here’s my real point, finally: why did they make this switch? Why did VW—and, really, the world—decide that front-engine/FWD cars like this were “better” than something like the Variant II?

Advertisement

To me, it makes no sense, and I can best explain why with this image:

Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Graphic: Jason Torchinsky

Advertisement

I get that the Variant II was built on an outdated platform with an outdated engine, but the packaging advantages seem so clear to me, and that makes me wonder why VW abandoned this idea they’d invested decades of development into so quickly.

The FWD Parati was basically like what everyone else was doing, which you would think would make it harder for VW to compete. Really, given the way the industry was going, it’s surprising the Variant II was built at all, though some suggest that the rear engine/rear drive combo still provided better traction in the rougher parts of Brazil.

Advertisement

Illustration for article titled I Dont Understand Why This Old Brazilian VW Is Not The Accepted Baseline Design For Nearly All Cars
Photo: VW do Brasil

Did VW not decide to pursue the tighter packaging model because basic FWD was cheaper? Was the understeer-prone handling more acceptable than the oversteer-prone rear-weight-bias handling? Did not enough people care about having two distinct types of cargo areas, and a more flexible overall design?

Advertisement

Was it ease of servicing? The underfloor engine actually had pretty good access from inside the car, but I can still see people feeling a conventional hood is easier, even though tinkering on a Variant II’s engine would at least keep you in the shade, no matter what.

I can imagine a then-modern Variant III with one of VW’s water-cooled inline fours laid flat under there, in basically the same package as the Parati, but with much more usable room.

Advertisement

I’m still haunted by this a bit, decades later, because part of me just respects the tight, no-wasted-space design of that Variant II so much, but, this battle is likely already lost.

Or is it? Modern electric cars, like all the Teslas, are all using underfloor motors and batteries, allowing for this kind of wonderful packaging once again. So maybe we’ll get to see that Variant IIIe after all, some day.

Tags: , ,

For GREAT deals on a new or used Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep or RAM check out Vacaville Dodge TODAY!

The Deluxe 12-window VW bus at Lake Huron after its journey | Robert Duffer photos

The plan was to plop an air mattress in the 1967 Volkswagen Type 2 Microbus and sleep in a van down by the river. It wasn’t a good plan; it was hardly a plan at all.

The Deluxe Station Bus painted orange and trimmed in white with white steel wheels and mirrored hubcaps contained three bench seats firmly bolted in place. It would not accommodate a mattress and I did not bring a tent. That would be but the first challenge in taking an international treasure out for an overnight jaunt.

vw

vw

When I picked it up outside of Detroit, where it huddled for attention with five other classic Volkswagens, from a 1984 Rabbit GTI to a Karmann Ghia roadster from the ‘60s, the liftgate above the rear pancake engine jammed open. Eventually, our man on the job, Joe, got it unstuck and I was on my way, puttering down the road, not feeling bad.

Something about that bench seat and the four-on-the-floor manual transmission excited me as much as any other time traveler set to take off. With the front axle underfoot and a split windshield leading the charge, no hood, no exhaust, and 21 glorious windows, anything could happen, except for breaking 70 mph.

The 1493-cc—OK, 1.5-liter—flat-4 engine in this heavily restored example owned by Volkswagen itself makes 53 horsepower, good enough to go from 0-60 mph when it can. Load it up with up to nine passengers and it can’t.

vw

vw

Volkswagen claims an aspirational top speed of 65 mph, but with the right speed, the right wind angle, and a blessing from the goddess Fortuna, the speedometer could hit 70 mph. On the Interstate, the wind pushed the Bus around like a bully and his thugs who only want to be amused. It handled like a boat that mated with a shopping cart to make a Bus, liable to tip, with swoopy sweeping steering demands, torsion bar axles in loose communication front and rear, and enough charm to make me accept that sometimes the destination is a welcome break from the journey.

I knew this piece of collector art on wheels would draw attention but never in my near 30 years of driving cars had I experienced such widespread and unabashed adoration for a vehicle that transcends generations and demographics. Kids waved, teens gawked, passersby—of which there were many in a 53-horsepower car—flashed thumbs, snapped shots, or nodded appreciatively. Boomers of a certain persuasion hustled to shoot it with their iPhones.

One Boomer in particular, with curls unfurling from this fishing cap, leaned on the hood of his truck and waved from the RV park where the road dead-ended and Lake Huron began. Private property surrounded the stamp-sized beach and there were no good angles. I ratcheted the parking brake free and pulled into a driveway to back out. Getting it to reverse was tricky, as promised. It went left of H but not down, then went into second, then went left of H again, and finally, it found that narrow groove into reverse. As I pulled away my Boomer fan had grown into five men, smirking and honoring my efforts with a golf clap. I laughed my ass off.

There’s a lightness to time travel, and it’s impossible to take yourself seriously behind the flat wheel of a Bus.

At the campground of Lakeport State Park on the western edge of Lake Huron, I loosened the wing nuts and propped open the front driver’s window to let in the cool lake breeze. There was no A/C, of course, only a push-button AM radio, an ashtray, and an aftermarket cupholder serving as cabin features. As the sweat cooled on my bald head, heads turned, fingers pointed, and smiles beamed.

vw

vw

The de facto camp host pointed me in the direction of my site and after I finished loading my firewood, he loaded a listing in his iPhone for a 13-window Bus, as if he were in the market, as if his fifth-wheel trailer could fit two Buses.

“Not sure why they call it that,” he said, counting the windows in the listing. “But this one is yours for $57,000.”

Windows are the defining marker of a Type 1 and, later, a Type 2, Bus. Not long after that conversation from the neighboring campsite, an older man with a tye-dyed Buenos Dias shirt and a salt-and-pepper rat tail couldn’t contain his excitement. “That a 23-window? Well, I’ll be.” He had a friend, who had a friend, they were in Costa Rica, some things happened, it was rarer than rare, he concluded, doing two full walk-arounds.

The standard Microbus, Kombi, or Type 1, depending on your country, came with 11 windows, three on either side, a rear window, two front door windows, and the split windshield. There were 13-window, 15-window, and the famous 23-window Bus that was discontinued for 1964. It featured two rear windows curving around the rear windshield, one more window on either side of the body for four per side, to match the four port windows on either side up top.

Those models with eight roof windows and a manually folding rooftop were known as Sambas. Since mine was a 1967, and didn’t have the curved rear windows, it was a 21-Window Bus—officially, a 1967 Type 2 Microbus 21-Window Deluxe Samba Bus that cost $2,900. It was the last year of the split windshield, the first year of seat belts for all seats. A similar Bus auctioned for $143,000 in 2017.

This one was priceless. It was a smile maker, with a magnetism as infectious as its Day-Glo orange and white body and giant smiling VW logo on its bulbous silly face. Two young women with a Polaroid–yup, those are back, too—snapped some shots and offered me one. Teens too cool to express anything but ennui said with a half-lidded nod, “Cool car.”

It made people want to be a part of it. Before the sun set, there seemed to be a good spot on the wooded dune to shoot it. But it would cramp the walkway to the beach. The first full weekend the Michigan state parks had been opened resulted in a packed house.

vw

vw

Some people wore masks, some didn’t. Some people had campaign signs that read “Our Governor is an IDIOT,” most people maintained a healthy social distance when addressing the Bus.

Camp hostess Jeanette had circled the wagons and flagged down Ranger A., and together, they agreed to help clear a path. They would get nothing out of it but a picture and the satisfaction of helping a stranger.

It was another tricky move, maneuvering the Bus around a swatch of woods on a narrow isthmus of solid ground surrounded by beach sand. Go too far one way, and it could tip into Lake Huron, which, like Lake Michigan, is at record high water levels. Or I could get a wheel stuck in the sand. No way the rear-wheel-drive van could pull itself out of that.

Nothing attracts a crowd, like a crowd of 1967 Type 2 Microbus oglers.

The most frequent comment, after the initial parlay, was “When is that new one coming out?” The Volkswagen ID Buzz Microbus is slated for 2022; it’ll be all-electric and hopefully have a name not as awkward as ID Buzz or as long as Type 2 Microbus 21 Window Deluxe Samba Bus.

Michiganders know the auto industry like southern Californians know the aftermarket. This buckle on the Rust Belt might be known as the home of The Detroit Three (or The Detroit 2.5 if you want to be snarky), but it should be known for its vast recreational opportunities nestled by four Great Lakes.

The enduring image of a Bus on California’s West Coast beaches might be favored in the collective consciousness, but this Bus felt just at home on Michigan’s coast, when it stood out like a Dreamsicle lighthouse amid a sea of trucks and RVs. The comments kept coming, and I kept fielding them.

Now, as then, this timepiece on wheels universally recognized from the counterculture era of the ‘60s, when a country divided took to the road as an expression of freedom, was a gateway to conversation; it was a way to connect with people at a time when disconnect is the prevailing order.

Later, at my fire, as I let my happy thoughts stew around beneath a sky so rich with stars the stardust would blanket my eyes better than the Sandman, I reassessed my situation. I could sleep to those stars, and if the bugs got too buggy, or if the Gypsy moth poop raining down from the oak tree beside me got to be too poopy, I could curl up on a bench seat on the Bus.

Then a pickup truck rumbled to a stop. It was the ranger. He pulled a 10-person tent out of the bed and handed it to me.

“Jeanette said you didn’t have a tent,” he said.

I blushed. I had mentioned it in passing when describing to Jeanette how it wasn’t a camper Bus, how I’d come from Chicago, how she was going back to the office for the first time in three months on Monday and was anxious, how we were all anxious.

I couldn’t turn it down. These were people helping people. This was an act of kindness. I slept that much better in the shadow of the Bus knowing that kindness is not of another era.

This article by Robert Duffer was originally published by Motor Authority, an editorial partner of ClassicCars.com.

Advertisement

!

Tags: , , , , ,